Abstract
In England, the persistent underachievement of white working-class students – predominantly boys – has been documented for over two decades. From entry into nursery aged three, white working-class boys underperform compared to their better off peers; this gap grows throughout primary and secondary schooling continues beyond age 18 in lower participation and completion rates in higher education, with long-term consequences for employment and financial security. Successive governments have introduced multiple policies, practices and interventions at all stages of education to address this so-called ‘attainment gap.’ However, their impact has been negligible and the Covid-19 pandemic has further exacerbated exiting inequalities. This article critiques policies and practices in English schooling which frame white working-class boys as deficient or ‘other.’ Drawing primarily on a review of existing literature, it argues that current approaches rest on an over-simplified understanding of educational underachievement and reveal a lack of political will to engage seriously with the complex, intersecting factors that shape disadvantage. A case study from one English primary school is presented to illustrate the nuanced realities of white working-class boys' underachievement. The article concludes by emphasising the urgent need for more critical, research-informed and intellectually robust policy and practice responses.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | International Journal of Inclusive Education |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 7 May 2026 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Underachievement and white British working-class boys: disengaged, disaffected or disenfranchised?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver