The persistence of the world religions paradigm: response to Jacob Barrett’s “Critical theory in world religions: an experiment in course (re)design”

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    34 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    When I came to Leeds Trinity University, my job title was “lecturer in World Religions” and two of the modules (courses) I was to teach were called World Religions 1 and World Religions 2. There was also a separate module on Method and Theory in the Study of Religion. I was discouraged from changing these in the first couple of years partly because of market expectations. I taught them in much the way as described in Jacob’s paper and in the chapters on “Subversive Pedagogies” in After World Religions (Cotter and Robertson, eds, 2016). I was aware that although we were subverting the World Religions Paradigm (WRP), we hadn’t removed it. This persistence of the WRP, even when we pick it apart, concerns me. Is it really possible to teach world religions without the world religions paradigm?

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)233-236
    Number of pages4
    JournalImplicit Religion
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Jul 2021

    Keywords

    • Classification
    • Course design
    • Religion
    • Teaching
    • World religions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The persistence of the world religions paradigm: response to Jacob Barrett’s “Critical theory in world religions: an experiment in course (re)design”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this