TY - JOUR
T1 - Simple but effective criteria
T2 - rethinking excellent qualitative research
AU - Megheirkouni, Majd
AU - Moir, James
N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright 2023: Majd Megheirkouni, James Moir, and Nova Southeastern University.
M1 - 11
PY - 2023/3/18
Y1 - 2023/3/18
N2 - Despite unremitting efforts to develop quality criteria of qualitative research, traditional criteria for the trustworthiness of qualitative results are still predominant in interpretive and naturalistic inquiries including Ph.D. studies. This work does not aim to replace the existing quality criteria but rather to update and simplify those criteria to include credibility, confirmability, and representativeness. The purpose of the study is to offer a review of existing criteria and strategies for qualitative research and to suggest simple criteria and strategies that will win the confidence of the academic community and augment the trustworthiness of qualitative research.
AB - Despite unremitting efforts to develop quality criteria of qualitative research, traditional criteria for the trustworthiness of qualitative results are still predominant in interpretive and naturalistic inquiries including Ph.D. studies. This work does not aim to replace the existing quality criteria but rather to update and simplify those criteria to include credibility, confirmability, and representativeness. The purpose of the study is to offer a review of existing criteria and strategies for qualitative research and to suggest simple criteria and strategies that will win the confidence of the academic community and augment the trustworthiness of qualitative research.
U2 - 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5845
DO - 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5845
M3 - Article
VL - 28
SP - 848
EP - 864
JO - The Qualitative Report
JF - The Qualitative Report
IS - 3
ER -