Response to Patrick Hart

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    219 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper is a response to Patrick Hart's article 'Theory, method, and madness in religious studies' and further interrogates the terms "theory" and "method," the relationship between them, and their application to the study of religion, particularly at a pedagogical level, where there is some confusion about what is referred to by these terms. This paper argues that theory and method should be included explicitly in religious studies programs and research to show how scholarship has been produced.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)31-34
    Number of pages4
    JournalMethod and Theory in the Study of Religion
    Volume28
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2016

    Keywords

    • method
    • religious studies
    • theology
    • theory

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Patrick Hart'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this