Modeling recovery housing retention and program outcomes by justice involvement among residents in Virginia, USA: an observational study

Arun Sondhi, Adela Bunaciu, David Best, Emily A. Hennessy, Jessica Best, Alessandro Leidl, Anthony Grimes, Matthew Conner, Robert DeTriquet, William White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Living in recovery housing can improve addiction recovery and desistance outcomes. This study examined whether retention in recovery housing and types of discharge outcome (completed, “neutral,” and “negative” outcomes) differed for clients with recent criminal legal system (CLS) involvement. Using data from 101 recovery residences certified by the Virginia Association of Recovery Residences based on 1,978 individuals completing the REC-CAP assessment, competing risk analyses (cumulative incidence function, restricted mean survival time, and restricted mean time lost) followed by the marginalization of effects were implemented to examine program outcomes at final discharge. Residents with recent CLS involvement were more likely to be discharged for positive reasons (successful completion of their goals) and premature/negative reasons (e.g., disciplinary releases) than for neutral reasons. Findings indicate that retention for 6–18 months is essential to establish and maintain positive discharge outcomes, and interventions should be developed to enhance retention in recovery residents with recent justice involvement.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Jun 2024

Keywords

  • recovery
  • recovery residences
  • time to event analysis
  • retention
  • outcomes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling recovery housing retention and program outcomes by justice involvement among residents in Virginia, USA: an observational study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this