Abstract
Channel Four’s media coverage of the London 2012 Paralympic Games is said to have delivered a seismic shift in attitudes towards those with disabilities. But why and how was a marginalised group brought into the mainstream by the media? What were the influencing factors and who made the decisions? By interviewing key people involved in the television production process, and accessing some of their internal documentation, my doctoral research sheds light on how meanings about disability were constructed and delivered from the top down and across the creative process. Channel Four’s unique funding model and risk-‐taking remit are again under review and this project explores the relationship between these industrial contexts and the portrayals of disability that made it to our screens as award winning content. My paper examines why, how and what representations of disability the decision-‐makers promoted and communicated as their preferred meanings.
These portrayals are discussed in the context of existing disability theory, derived mainly from other paradigms. I also examine how sporting tropes and programme formats were used to reduce the stigma of ‘otherness’ and bring a marginalised group into the mainstream.
These portrayals are discussed in the context of existing disability theory, derived mainly from other paradigms. I also examine how sporting tropes and programme formats were used to reduce the stigma of ‘otherness’ and bring a marginalised group into the mainstream.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publication status | Published - 12 Jan 2017 |
Event | MeCCSA Annual Conference 2017: Culture, Media, Equality and Freedom - University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom Duration: 11 Jan 2017 → 13 Jan 2017 http://meccsa2017.org.uk/ |
Academic conference
Academic conference | MeCCSA Annual Conference 2017 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Leeds |
Period | 11/01/17 → 13/01/17 |
Internet address |