Juries in Rape Trials

Nigel Booth, Dominic Willmott, Daniel Boduszek

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

    Abstract

    The most comprehensive mock trial research project on juror attitudes in rape cases has recently called into question the traditional perception of a criminal trial, that juries reach impartial verdicts based on a balanced assessment of the evidence. It will be recalled that in the UK no inquiries are permitted of jury verdicts, and the jury do not give reasons for their verdicts. The integrity of the jury’s decision-making process is presumed; to think otherwise is to undermine the system itself. But is the system working? Is it even capable of working?
    Original languageEnglish
    Volume181
    Specialist publicationCriminal Law and Justice Weekly
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Oct 2017

    Keywords

    • Jury
    • jury decision making
    • rape

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Juries in Rape Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this