Improving the management of hospital waiting lists by using nudges in letters: a randomised controlled trial

Robert P. Murphy, Carol Taaffe, Molly Byrne, Peter Lunn, Deirdre A. Robertson, Helen Ryan, Alex Wood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective
A commonly adopted intervention to help to reduce wait times for hospital treatment is administrative validation, where administrators write to patients to check if a procedure is still required. The did not return (DNR) rate to validation letters is substantial. We tested whether the DNR rate was reduced by introducing nudges to validation letters.

Methods
Participants from eight public hospitals (N = 2855; in 2017) in Ireland were randomized to receive an existing (control group) or a redesigned validation letter including nudges (intervention group).

Results
Participants in the intervention group were less likely not to return it than those in the control group, OR = .756, SE = .069, p = .002. Control and intervention group DNR rates were 23.97% and 19.24%. This is equivalent to 1 in 5 non-responders changing their behaviour because of the redesigned letter.

Conclusions
The redesigned letter increased patient compliance with the validation process. The redesign has subsequently been adopted by public hospitals in Ireland.
Original languageEnglish
Article number117343
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume361
Early online date21 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the management of hospital waiting lists by using nudges in letters: a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this