General practitioners’ beliefs about the clinical utility of complementary and alternative medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-253
JournalPrimary Health Care Research & Development
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes
Aim: To investigate GPs’ beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its role in clinical practice.
Background: Despite the prevalence of CAM in the United Kingdom, little is known about GPs beliefs regarding these alternative approaches to patient management and how they view it in relation to their clinical conduct and practice.
Method: A qualitative study conducted on 19 GPs recruited from the North West of England. Semi-structured telephone interviews were analysed using an inductive thematic analysis.
Results: Three themes emerged from the data: limited evidence base, patient demand and concerns over regulation.
Conclusion: Despite recognising the limited evidence base of CAM, GPs continue to see a role for it within clinical practice. This is not necessarily led by patient demand that is highly related to affluence. However, GPs raised concerns over the regulation of CAM practitioners and CAM therapies.

    Research areas

  • Beliefs, complementary/alternative medicine, general practitioner, qualitative

External organisations

  • University of Manchester
  • University of Bristol

View graph of relations