Confirmatory factor analysis of the irrational Performance Beliefs Inventory (iPBI) in a sample of amateur and semi-professional athletes

M. J. Turner, M. S. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives - This investigation sought to test the construct validity of the irrational performance beliefs inventory (iPBI) in a sample of amateur and semi-professional athletes. 

Method - In total, 550 athletes (312 men, 212 women, Mage = 38.04 ± 13.80 years) completed the iPBI and demographic questions at a single time point. 

Results - Confirmatory factor analysis showed lower than acceptable fit indices for the 28-item iPBI (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.84). After removal of potential problem items, a 20-item version (iPBI-2) was developed (CFI = 0.91). Results showed that amateur athletes scored higher than semi-professional athletes on primary irrational beliefs and low frustration tolerance, whereas semi-professional athletes scored higher than amateur athletes on depreciation. 

Conclusions - This study provides initial evidence of construct validity for a 20-item version of the iPBI in an athletic sample, and shows medium effect size differences in irrational beliefs between amateur and semi-professional athletes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)126-130
Number of pages5
JournalPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume35
Issue numberMarch
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Construct validity
  • Criterion validity
  • Gender differences
  • REBT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Confirmatory factor analysis of the irrational Performance Beliefs Inventory (iPBI) in a sample of amateur and semi-professional athletes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this