Description
A Grammatical Investigation of MiraclesWittgenstein claims that religious belief does not stand on evidence, that only those with a religious point of view can see an event as a miracle, and that experiencing a miracle can influence a person towards religion. This faces two challenges. First, if miracles can only be seen from a religious point of view, then suggesting that a miracle can influence a person towards religion implies that a person can see a miracle before having a religious point of view. Second, if religious belief is not based on evidence, then those who report believing because of evidence are confused about their beliefs in a way we would not expect. I argue that these are not challenges to Wittgenstein’s account but symptoms of our misunderstanding of grammar and his distinction between relative and absolute miracles.
| Period | 5 Dec 2024 |
|---|---|
| Event type | Academic seminar/workshop |
| Location | Leeds, United KingdomShow on map |
| Degree of Recognition | National |
Keywords
- Wittgenstein
- Miracles
- grammar
- theology
- belief
- faith
- doxastic
- fideism
- hinge epistemology
Related content
-
Research Outputs
-
Wittgenstein and arguments from design
Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review
-
Hume and Wittgenstein: the risk of reasoning religion into superstition
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Faith seeking understanding: a reply to Radenovic’s ‘Philosophy of my Faith’
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Shifting the spotlight: what do we mean by ‘religious language?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
'God is Love' is a grammatical remark
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
-
A grammatical investigation of miracles
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
From surface to depth: resolving two problems in the grammar of belief
Research output: Contribution to conference › Abstract › peer-review
-
Wittgenstein's dichotomy and religious diversity
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Hume and Wittgenstein on faith and reason in religious belief
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
-
Can atheists play along? Wittgensteinian challenges to religious fictionalism
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Are miracles believable for contemporary Christians?
Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Blog post
-
Wittgenstein: on certainty and religion
Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review
-
‘God is Love’ is a grammatical remark
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review
-
Hume and Wittgenstein: the risk of reasoning religion into superstition
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review
-
Activities
-
British Society for the Philosophy of Religion (External organisation)
Activity: Membership › Membership of learned society or professional body
-
The British Wittgenstein Society (External organisation)
Activity: Membership › Membership of learned society or professional body
-
Resurrection or Resuscitation: Miracle or Medical Phenomenon?
Activity: Invited talk/public lecture/debate